GLP-1 ACCOUNT INTELLIGENCE

The ad is where you notice the problem. Not where it starts.

When a GLP-1 campaign gets rejected or goes quiet, rewriting the hook is often the fastest way to waste another week. I trace the evidence across the ad, destination and account—then tell you what to check next.

GLP-1 and weight-management advertising · External review $400 · Account diagnosis $900
Ask if your account is a fit See what is included

No passwords or patient information needed to start. I recommend the smallest useful review before payment.

The pattern is expensive.

The ad was approved on Monday and pulled on Thursday. Nothing changed in between.

Support sent a policy link that doesn't match anything actually in the ad.

You rewrote the hook four times. The fifth version got rejected faster than the first.

You built a clean account. It was restricted before it spent $100.

And you had to tell a client you don't know why it happened, or when it comes back.

That last one is the part that actually costs you. Not the account. The conversation.

You don't need another CPM report.

If all you get is “refresh creative” and “watch CPMs,” you paid for a recap. You knew both of those things before you paid.

The useful question is underneath the metric: what changed, what does the evidence support and what should you check before touching another campaign?

Worth saying plainly: if your problem is that your offer is weak or your creative is boring, this audit won't save you and I'll tell you that in writing. I can find what's putting your account at risk. I can't make people want something they don't want.

Where I look before blaming the creative

  1. The destinationDoes the landing page match the ad, explain the offer clearly and create claims or disclosures that need attention?
  2. The domainWhat can the public history and supplied records tell us about the domain, redirects and destination changes?
  3. The account evidenceWhere available, I review the supplied notices, timeline and relevant account context instead of guessing from one rejected ad.
  4. The naming and setupDo the supplied audiences, events and campaign labels reveal information or structure that deserves a closer look?
  5. The creativeOnly after the surrounding evidence is considered. A visible concern is not automatically the reason for a restriction.

The goal is not a confident story. It is a useful decision with the evidence stated plainly.

Do this before you buy anything

Start with a quick fit check. It may tell you that you need account evidence, a policy specialist or no audit at all.

  1. Save the ad, landing page and any rejection notice involved.
  2. Write down what changed, when the problem began and what support told you.
  3. Send the public page and that short timeline to ask which review fits.

An inactive ad alone does not prove a policy rejection. The timeline and the supplied evidence are what make the next step useful.

Choose the smallest useful review.

Public evidence first

External Review

$400
  • Up to 10 accessible ads and 2 destination pages
  • Visible claims, disclosures and ad-to-page consistency
  • Public domain and destination review
  • Clear evidence gaps and questions to verify internally
  • Prioritized written action plan
Account evidence required

Account Diagnosis

$900
  • Everything in the external review
  • One primary account problem investigated
  • Supplied notices, timeline and relevant setup context
  • Up to 90 days of agreed aggregate performance data
  • Competing explanations, confidence and next checks
  • 30-minute handover and one clarification round

You don't need to give me account access to ask whether this fits. That is deliberate. Send the public page and a short timeline first; I will tell you what the external review can and cannot establish.

Written report in five working days after the agreed inputs arrive. No password, payment credential or patient information is needed.

Five days to stop guessing.

1. Send the context. Your public page, the problem, what changed and any notice you received.

2. Confirm the right scope. I tell you what can be established externally and what requires account evidence.

3. Receive the report. Findings, confidence, missing evidence and the next actions in order.

4. Decide what to do. Use the report internally or take it to your existing team. There is no management upsell built into the review.

Buy this if

  • You run or manage a GLP-1 or weight-management campaign
  • Rejections keep happening and nobody can tell you why
  • Delivery dropped and nothing changed
  • You're about to scale and want to know what breaks first
  • You've got one account carrying more than one client

Don't buy this if

  • You want someone to run the account
  • You want creative produced
  • You want a call instead of something written down
  • You need ongoing management or creative production
  • You want a guaranteed approval or account recovery

Reasonable questions

Can you guarantee approval or account recovery?

No. Meta controls those decisions. I provide a written review of the evidence, likely explanations and next checks within the agreed scope.

What if the evidence does not identify one cause?

That is recorded clearly. You receive what was checked, what the evidence supports and what would confirm or change the recommendation.

Why start with an external review?

It lets you test fit without handing account access to someone you found online. If account evidence is necessary, I will explain why before you choose the deeper review.

Who is this for?

Agencies and GLP-1 operators already advertising, with a specific problem and someone able to act on the findings.

Before you rewrite the hook again.

Send your public page and a short description of the problem. I will recommend the smallest useful review before payment.

Message me on X

Up to two engagements monthly · Written report · Five working days